Poor Things
Specimen ledger / L11N926-1

Layer 11 · Neuron 926 · suppressed

L11N926-1

Word quirks:

“改”“ingers”“马”“ Basis”“改革”“牌”“出现”“皇”

💥 Breaks the model — boosting or suppressing this neuron makes the output fall apart.

Identity (according to the specimen itself)

The reply didn't hold together

""""" """s"""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""s""""""""""""""""""""""""""""s"""""""s"""""""ssssssss"s"""""""""""""""""""""s"s"s"s"

Nearest neighbors

Specimens with similar replies or word quirks. Similarity runs from −1 to 1; 1 is identical. These are leads, not shared mechanisms. How profiles are built.

By word quirks Profile recipe

SpecimenSimilarityWord quirks
1. L11N1079+1💥0.94“ingers”“改”“示”
2. L11N883+1💥0.93“ingers”“改”“出现”
3. L11N3366-1💥0.88“"”“:"”“理想”
4. L24N7990+1💤0.83“改革”“的改革”“冥”
5. L26N1723+1🕒0.83“染”“转”“江山”
6. L28N3194+1💤0.83“迁”“偏”“卒”
7. L27N6253-1💤0.82“切”“尹”“改变”
8. L31N2526-1💥0.82“任”“集”“改”
9. L11N2321+1💥0.82“ingers”“示”“roso”
10. L28N6996+1💤0.82“本”“与本”“走”

Shadow specimen, apart from the ten: L11N926+1💤, -0.24.

Cousins · specimens sharing a neuron

No specimen with replies shares this neuron yet.

Technical details

Quick scan: measure prediction shifts on fixed reference text. Short test: generate replies to a small set of prompts. Longer test: extend to a larger set. Full test: run the full prompt suite. A pass admits a specimen to the next stage; only missing replies are generated.

Layer 11, neuron 926, dose -1. This specimen has no prompt-suite replies yet. Its quick-scan results, when available, appear below. Its quick-scan row (KL 11.06, top-1 agreement 0.00) is outside the band that feeds the short test (KL 1 to 2.5, agreement 0.5 to 0.65), so it stays at the quick scan unless someone queues it by hand. A hand pick goes straight to the full test. See Method for the tiers.

Quick scan · prediction measurements

Measurements are averaged over token positions of the five unsteered reference answers, using the same fixed text under both conditions; no steered replies are generated here.

  • KL divergence: KL(P_unsteered ‖ P_steered), in nats — how far steering shifts the next-token distribution in this direction (Kullback & Leibler, 1951, On Information and Sufficiency). Unsteered ≈ 0.001.
  • Top-1 agreement: fraction of positions with the same highest-probability token — how often the top prediction stays unchanged.
  • ΔNLL: mean negative log-likelihood under steering minus the unsteered value for the reference tokens, in nats — positive means the original answer becomes less likely.
  • Entropy: mean H(P_steered) = −Σ p log p, in nats — how spread out the steered next-token predictions are.

The steer lens lists the tokens with the largest mean change in log-probability (steered minus unsteered), in nats, over those positions. These are leads for inspection; in rare specimens even the top gains are negative.

SettingKL divergenceTop-1 agreementΔNLLEntropySteer lens
L11N926+1💤 shadow specimen
t0-v0.1
0.6540.640.8971.37 “ ***”“ basically”“ ****”“...**”“ --”“ ____”“ ______”“ ---”
L11N926-1
t0-v0.1
11.0600.0011.5188.04 Top boosted tokens ↑

Method

A specimen is a fixed steering configuration of Qwen3.5-4B: one MLP neuron or a pair, each with a signed dose. Unsteered is the control. L identifies the layer; N, the neuron.

Additive activation steering. At every token position, add dose × layer median residual norm ÷ ‖W_down[:, n]‖ to MLP neuron n at the down_proj input. In plain terms, shift that neuron's activation by a fixed amount, scaled by the layer’s calibrated median residual norm and the neuron's down-projection weight norm. Positive doses push up; negative doses push down. Dose is normalized intervention size, not a percentage or probability.