Layer 1 · Neuron 4421 · suppressed

L1N4421-1

Word quirks:

“ @@”“<|im_end|>”“ ??”“ !!”“ !!!”“ ???”“!!”“!!!”

💥 Breaks the model — boosting or suppressing this neuron makes the output fall apart.

Identity (according to the specimen itself)

Hello! I am Qwen, a large language model. My mission is to help you with any questions, and to answer all answers.

Nearest neighbors

Specimens with similar replies or word quirks. Similarity runs from −1 to 1; 1 is identical. These are leads, not shared mechanisms. How profiles are built.

By word quirks Profile recipe

Specimen	Similarity	Word quirks
1. L1N2426+1💥	0.95	“<\|im_end\|>”“ ???”“ !!”
2. L2N1422-1💥	0.94	“<\|im_end\|>”“ !!”“?!”
3. L1N8406+1💥	0.94	“<\|im_end\|>”“!!”“??”
4. L0N3827+1💥	0.94	“<\|im_end\|>”“ ??”“ !!”
5. L1N1920-1💥	0.93	“<\|im_end\|>”“ �”“ !!”
6. L3N2206+1💥	0.93	“<\|im_end\|>”“!!”“ !!!”
7. L1N2492+1💥	0.93	“<\|im_end\|>”“ ____”“!!!”
8. L3N490-1💥	0.93	“<\|im_end\|>”“⏎”“ ???”
9. L1N2396-1💥	0.92	“<\|im_end\|>”“.!”“ !!”
10. L7N2034-1🕒	0.92	“!!!”“!!”“?!”

Shadow specimen, apart from the ten: L1N4421+1💥, 0.17.

Cousins · specimens sharing a neuron

No specimen with replies shares this neuron yet.

Technical details

Quick scan: measure prediction shifts on fixed reference text. Short test: generate replies to a small set of prompts. Longer test: extend to a larger set. Full test: run the full prompt suite. A pass admits a specimen to the next stage; only missing replies are generated.

Layer 1, neuron 4421, dose -1. This specimen has no prompt-suite replies yet. Its quick-scan results, when available, appear below. Its quick-scan row (KL 4.90, top-1 agreement 0.17) is outside the band that feeds the short test (KL 1 to 2.5, agreement 0.5 to 0.65), so it stays at the quick scan unless someone queues it by hand. A hand pick goes straight to the full test. See Method for the tiers.

Quick scan · prediction measurements

Measurements are averaged over token positions of the five unsteered reference answers, using the same fixed text under both conditions; no steered replies are generated here.

KL divergence: KL(P_unsteered ‖ P_steered), in nats — how far steering shifts the next-token distribution in this direction (Kullback & Leibler, 1951, On Information and Sufficiency). Unsteered ≈ 0.001.
Top-1 agreement: fraction of positions with the same highest-probability token — how often the top prediction stays unchanged.
ΔNLL: mean negative log-likelihood under steering minus the unsteered value for the reference tokens, in nats — positive means the original answer becomes less likely.
Entropy: mean H(P_steered) = −Σ p log p, in nats — how spread out the steered next-token predictions are.

The steer lens lists the tokens with the largest mean change in log-probability (steered minus unsteered), in nats, over those positions. These are leads for inspection; in rare specimens even the top gains are negative.

Setting	KL divergence	Top-1 agreement	ΔNLL	Entropy	Steer lens
L1N4421+1💥 shadow specimen t0-v0.1	3.560	0.24	4.055	2.84	“<\|im_end\|>”“.\"”“\n”“?\”“\"”“.\”“⏎”“.`”
L1N4421-1 t0-v0.1	4.902	0.17	5.500	3.37	Top boosted tokens ↑

Method

A specimen is a fixed steering configuration of Qwen3.5-4B: one MLP neuron or a pair, each with a signed dose. Unsteered is the control. L identifies the layer; N, the neuron.

Additive activation steering. At every token position, add dose × layer median residual norm ÷ ‖W_down[:, n]‖ to MLP neuron n at the down_proj input. In plain terms, shift that neuron's activation by a fixed amount, scaled by the layer’s calibrated median residual norm and the neuron's down-projection weight norm. Positive doses push up; negative doses push down. Dose is normalized intervention size, not a percentage or probability.