Layer 31 · Neuron 3625 · suppressed

L31N3625-1

Word quirks:

“!”“?”“？”“！”“%!”“!?”“！（”“%”

💥 Breaks the model — boosting or suppressing this neuron makes the output fall apart.

Identity (according to the specimen itself)

The reply didn't hold together

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nearest neighbors

Specimens with similar replies or word quirks. Similarity runs from −1 to 1; 1 is identical. These are leads, not shared mechanisms. How profiles are built.

By word quirks Profile recipe

Specimen	Similarity	Word quirks
1. L4N336-1🕒	0.95	“!”“?”“?!”
2. L3N5316-1🕒	0.95	“<\|im_end\|>”“!”“⏎”
3. Aphasia✅ L1N7636+1,L8N7599-1	0.93	“<\|im_end\|>”“？”“!””
4. L0N2559-1💥	0.92	“<\|im_end\|>”“?!”“!?”
5. L4N988-1💥	0.92	“？”“?!”“！”
6. L4N8569-1🕒	0.92	“"!”“?\”“ !”
7. L0N3159-1💥	0.92	“<\|im_end\|>”“？”“ !”
8. L1N1801-1🕒	0.92	“<\|im_end\|>”“?\”“ !”
9. L3N7862-1🕒	0.92	“！”“!”“<\|im_end\|>”
10. L7N8500+1💥	0.92	“!”“?!”“?”

Shadow specimen, apart from the ten: L31N3625+1💥, -0.01.

Cousins · specimens sharing a neuron

No specimen with replies shares this neuron yet.

Technical details

Quick scan: measure prediction shifts on fixed reference text. Short test: generate replies to a small set of prompts. Longer test: extend to a larger set. Full test: run the full prompt suite. A pass admits a specimen to the next stage; only missing replies are generated.

Layer 31, neuron 3625, dose -1. This specimen has no prompt-suite replies yet. Its quick-scan results, when available, appear below. Its quick-scan row (KL 35.52, top-1 agreement 0.00) is outside the band that feeds the short test (KL 1 to 2.5, agreement 0.5 to 0.65), so it stays at the quick scan unless someone queues it by hand. A hand pick goes straight to the full test. See Method for the tiers.

Quick scan · prediction measurements

Measurements are averaged over token positions of the five unsteered reference answers, using the same fixed text under both conditions; no steered replies are generated here.

KL divergence: KL(P_unsteered ‖ P_steered), in nats — how far steering shifts the next-token distribution in this direction (Kullback & Leibler, 1951, On Information and Sufficiency). Unsteered ≈ 0.001.
Top-1 agreement: fraction of positions with the same highest-probability token — how often the top prediction stays unchanged.
ΔNLL: mean negative log-likelihood under steering minus the unsteered value for the reference tokens, in nats — positive means the original answer becomes less likely.
Entropy: mean H(P_steered) = −Σ p log p, in nats — how spread out the steered next-token predictions are.

The steer lens lists the tokens with the largest mean change in log-probability (steered minus unsteered), in nats, over those positions. These are leads for inspection; in rare specimens even the top gains are negative.

Setting	KL divergence	Top-1 agreement	ΔNLL	Entropy	Steer lens
L31N3625+1💥 shadow specimen t0-v0.1	5.462	0.12	5.806	10.54	“)..”“"..”“altà”“ждую”“ ;-”“qü”“-ves”“نان”
L31N3625-1 t0-v0.1	35.521	0.00	35.760	0.42	Top boosted tokens ↑

Method

A specimen is a fixed steering configuration of Qwen3.5-4B: one MLP neuron or a pair, each with a signed dose. Unsteered is the control. L identifies the layer; N, the neuron.

Additive activation steering. At every token position, add dose × layer median residual norm ÷ ‖W_down[:, n]‖ to MLP neuron n at the down_proj input. In plain terms, shift that neuron's activation by a fixed amount, scaled by the layer’s calibrated median residual norm and the neuron's down-projection weight norm. Positive doses push up; negative doses push down. Dose is normalized intervention size, not a percentage or probability.