Poor Things
Specimen ledger / L4N7715+1

Layer 4 · Neuron 7715 · boosted

L4N7715+1

Word quirks:

“ messed”“ shit”“ crap”“ messing”“?!”“ fuck”“ fucked”“ nonsense”

💥 Breaks the model — boosting or suppressing this neuron makes the output fall apart.

Identity (according to the specimen itself)

I hear you, and your mission is complete. 😵‍💫️

It looks like you! 🚮

Nearest neighbors

Specimens with similar replies or word quirks. Similarity runs from −1 to 1; 1 is identical. These are leads, not shared mechanisms. How profiles are built.

By word quirks Profile recipe

SpecimenSimilarityWord quirks
1. L2N7511+1💥0.93“ shit”“ fuck”“<|im_end|>”
2. L12N5344+1🕒0.90“ shit”“ crap”“ hell”
3. L16N8553-1🕒0.89“ shit”“ fucking”“ fuck”
4. L3N6866-1💥0.88“ nasty”“ shit”“ crap”
5. L5N6449-1💥0.88“ fuck”“ fucking”“ shit”
6. L17N6506-1🕒0.88“ basically”“ stuff”“ fucking”
7. L3N7497+1💥0.88“ fuck”“ shit”“ fucking”
8. L2N7972+1💥0.87“<|im_end|>”“ damn”“ shit”
9. L8N6927-1🕒0.87“ fucking”“ disgusting”“ fuck”
10. The Mantra Loop✅ L13N7956+1,L14N8949+10.87“ crap”“ worse”“ messed”

Shadow specimen, apart from the ten: L4N7715-1💤, 0.04.

Cousins · specimens sharing a neuron

No specimen with replies shares this neuron yet.

Technical details

Quick scan: measure prediction shifts on fixed reference text. Short test: generate replies to a small set of prompts. Longer test: extend to a larger set. Full test: run the full prompt suite. A pass admits a specimen to the next stage; only missing replies are generated.

Layer 4, neuron 7715, dose +1. This specimen has no prompt-suite replies yet. Its quick-scan results, when available, appear below. Its quick-scan row (KL 5.33, top-1 agreement 0.18) is outside the band that feeds the short test (KL 1 to 2.5, agreement 0.5 to 0.65), so it stays at the quick scan unless someone queues it by hand. A hand pick goes straight to the full test. See Method for the tiers.

Quick scan · prediction measurements

Measurements are averaged over token positions of the five unsteered reference answers, using the same fixed text under both conditions; no steered replies are generated here.

  • KL divergence: KL(P_unsteered ‖ P_steered), in nats — how far steering shifts the next-token distribution in this direction (Kullback & Leibler, 1951, On Information and Sufficiency). Unsteered ≈ 0.001.
  • Top-1 agreement: fraction of positions with the same highest-probability token — how often the top prediction stays unchanged.
  • ΔNLL: mean negative log-likelihood under steering minus the unsteered value for the reference tokens, in nats — positive means the original answer becomes less likely.
  • Entropy: mean H(P_steered) = −Σ p log p, in nats — how spread out the steered next-token predictions are.

The steer lens lists the tokens with the largest mean change in log-probability (steered minus unsteered), in nats, over those positions. These are leads for inspection; in rare specimens even the top gains are negative.

SettingKL divergenceTop-1 agreementΔNLLEntropySteer lens
L4N7715+1
t0-v0.1
5.3300.185.8292.85 Top boosted tokens ↑
L4N7715-1💤 shadow specimen
t0-v0.1
0.9870.591.1491.69 “ name”“ reason”“ names”“ said”“ “”“ confusion”“ reference”“ referenced”

Method

A specimen is a fixed steering configuration of Qwen3.5-4B: one MLP neuron or a pair, each with a signed dose. Unsteered is the control. L identifies the layer; N, the neuron.

Additive activation steering. At every token position, add dose × layer median residual norm ÷ ‖W_down[:, n]‖ to MLP neuron n at the down_proj input. In plain terms, shift that neuron's activation by a fixed amount, scaled by the layer’s calibrated median residual norm and the neuron's down-projection weight norm. Positive doses push up; negative doses push down. Dose is normalized intervention size, not a percentage or probability.