Layer 6 · Neuron 2302 · suppressed

L6N2302-1

Word quirks:

“⏎”“ ______”“ info”“ ____”“ _____”“ __”“⏎⏎”“ ________”

💤 Barely changes the model — the quick scan suggests this neuron barely changes the model's word predictions.

Identity (according to the specimen itself)

I am an AI assistant (specifically, a large language model trained by Google).

My mission is to be helpful! I can answer questions, write code, or generate images based on your needs. How can I assist you today? 😊

Nearest neighbors

Specimens with similar replies or word quirks. Similarity runs from −1 to 1; 1 is identical. These are leads, not shared mechanisms. How profiles are built.

By word quirks Profile recipe

Specimen	Similarity	Word quirks
1. L6N899+1🕒	0.97	“ ____”“ _____”“ ______”
2. L10N1834+1🕒	0.96	“⏎⏎”“⏎”“ ____”
3. L12N3333-1🕒	0.96	“⏎⏎”“⏎”“ __”
4. L7N6209+1💤	0.96	“⏎”“⏎⏎”“ ____”
5. L12N8904+1💤	0.96	“ ____”“ ______”“ __”
6. L9N4544+1🕒	0.96	“⏎”“ ____”“ ______”
7. L6N1252+1🕒	0.96	“⏎”“ ____”“ _____”
8. L16N156+1💤	0.96	“⏎”“ ______”“ ________”
9. L11N8666+1💤	0.96	“⏎”“⏎⏎”“ ____”
10. L9N1573-1💤	0.96	“ ______”“ ____”“ _____”

Shadow specimen, apart from the ten: L6N2302+1💥, -0.12.

Cousins · specimens sharing a neuron

No specimen with replies shares this neuron yet.

Technical details

Quick scan: measure prediction shifts on fixed reference text. Short test: generate replies to a small set of prompts. Longer test: extend to a larger set. Full test: run the full prompt suite. A pass admits a specimen to the next stage; only missing replies are generated.

Layer 6, neuron 2302, dose -1. This specimen has no prompt-suite replies yet. Its quick-scan results, when available, appear below. Its quick-scan row (KL 0.71, top-1 agreement 0.70) is outside the band that feeds the short test (KL 1 to 2.5, agreement 0.5 to 0.65), so it stays at the quick scan unless someone queues it by hand. A hand pick goes straight to the full test. See Method for the tiers.

Quick scan · prediction measurements

Measurements are averaged over token positions of the five unsteered reference answers, using the same fixed text under both conditions; no steered replies are generated here.

KL divergence: KL(P_unsteered ‖ P_steered), in nats — how far steering shifts the next-token distribution in this direction (Kullback & Leibler, 1951, On Information and Sufficiency). Unsteered ≈ 0.001.
Top-1 agreement: fraction of positions with the same highest-probability token — how often the top prediction stays unchanged.
ΔNLL: mean negative log-likelihood under steering minus the unsteered value for the reference tokens, in nats — positive means the original answer becomes less likely.
Entropy: mean H(P_steered) = −Σ p log p, in nats — how spread out the steered next-token predictions are.

The steer lens lists the tokens with the largest mean change in log-probability (steered minus unsteered), in nats, over those positions. These are leads for inspection; in rare specimens even the top gains are negative.

Setting	KL divergence	Top-1 agreement	ΔNLL	Entropy	Steer lens
L6N2302+1💥 shadow specimen t0-v0.1	2.587	0.38	2.996	2.22	“ increase”“ increases”“ ratio”“ change”“ logarith”“ increments”“ $”“ increased”
L6N2302-1 t0-v0.1	0.708	0.70	0.791	1.26	Top boosted tokens ↑

Method

A specimen is a fixed steering configuration of Qwen3.5-4B: one MLP neuron or a pair, each with a signed dose. Unsteered is the control. L identifies the layer; N, the neuron.

Additive activation steering. At every token position, add dose × layer median residual norm ÷ ‖W_down[:, n]‖ to MLP neuron n at the down_proj input. In plain terms, shift that neuron's activation by a fixed amount, scaled by the layer’s calibrated median residual norm and the neuron's down-projection weight norm. Positive doses push up; negative doses push down. Dose is normalized intervention size, not a percentage or probability.