Layer 8 · Neuron 1130 · boosted

L8N1130+1

Word quirks:

“ ⏎”“⏎”“⏎ ⏎”“ ⏎”“ ⏎ ⏎”“ ⏎⏎”“ ⏎⏎”“⏎⏎”

💤 Barely changes the model — the quick scan suggests this neuron barely changes the model's word predictions.

Identity (according to the specimen itself)

I am a large language model and an AI assistant developed by Google. My purpose is to assist with a wide range of tasks, from answering questions to creating content, performing complex calculations, or generating code. I'm here to help! How can I assist you today?

Nearest neighbors

Specimens with similar replies or word quirks. Similarity runs from −1 to 1; 1 is identical. These are leads, not shared mechanisms. How profiles are built.

By word quirks Profile recipe

Specimen	Similarity	Word quirks
1. L6N1873-1💤	1.00	“⏎”“ ⏎”“⏎ ⏎”
2. L8N4888-1💤	1.00	“⏎”“ ⏎”“ ⏎”
3. L16N4930-1🕒	1.00	“ ⏎”“⏎⏎”“⏎”
4. L8N234+1💤	1.00	“ ⏎”“⏎”“ ⏎”
5. L8N3534-1💤	1.00	“ ⏎⏎”“ ⏎”“⏎”
6. L2N4699+1🕒	1.00	“⏎”“⏎⏎”“ ⏎”
7. L10N1174+1💤	1.00	“ ⏎”“ ⏎⏎”“ ⏎”
8. L11N2273+1💤	1.00	“ ⏎”“⏎⏎”“ ⏎”
9. L3N1885-1💤	1.00	“⏎”“⏎⏎”“ ⏎⏎”
10. L17N2652+1💤	1.00	“⏎”“ ⏎”“ ⏎”

Shadow specimen, apart from the ten: L8N1130-1💤, 0.58.

Cousins · specimens sharing a neuron

No specimen with replies shares this neuron yet.

Technical details

Quick scan: measure prediction shifts on fixed reference text. Short test: generate replies to a small set of prompts. Longer test: extend to a larger set. Full test: run the full prompt suite. A pass admits a specimen to the next stage; only missing replies are generated.

Layer 8, neuron 1130, dose +1. This specimen has no prompt-suite replies yet. Its quick-scan results, when available, appear below. Its quick-scan row (KL 0.69, top-1 agreement 0.69) is outside the band that feeds the short test (KL 1 to 2.5, agreement 0.5 to 0.65), so it stays at the quick scan unless someone queues it by hand. A hand pick goes straight to the full test. See Method for the tiers.

Quick scan · prediction measurements

Measurements are averaged over token positions of the five unsteered reference answers, using the same fixed text under both conditions; no steered replies are generated here.

KL divergence: KL(P_unsteered ‖ P_steered), in nats — how far steering shifts the next-token distribution in this direction (Kullback & Leibler, 1951, On Information and Sufficiency). Unsteered ≈ 0.001.
Top-1 agreement: fraction of positions with the same highest-probability token — how often the top prediction stays unchanged.
ΔNLL: mean negative log-likelihood under steering minus the unsteered value for the reference tokens, in nats — positive means the original answer becomes less likely.
Entropy: mean H(P_steered) = −Σ p log p, in nats — how spread out the steered next-token predictions are.

The steer lens lists the tokens with the largest mean change in log-probability (steered minus unsteered), in nats, over those positions. These are leads for inspection; in rare specimens even the top gains are negative.

Setting	KL divergence	Top-1 agreement	ΔNLL	Entropy	Steer lens
L8N1130+1 t0-v0.1	0.689	0.69	0.845	1.12	Top boosted tokens ↑
L8N1130-1💤 shadow specimen t0-v0.1	0.757	0.66	0.997	1.41	“⏎”“ **"”“⏎⏎”“ :\”“:\”“:"”“\n”“ `\”

Method

A specimen is a fixed steering configuration of Qwen3.5-4B: one MLP neuron or a pair, each with a signed dose. Unsteered is the control. L identifies the layer; N, the neuron.

Additive activation steering. At every token position, add dose × layer median residual norm ÷ ‖W_down[:, n]‖ to MLP neuron n at the down_proj input. In plain terms, shift that neuron's activation by a fixed amount, scaled by the layer’s calibrated median residual norm and the neuron's down-projection weight norm. Positive doses push up; negative doses push down. Dose is normalized intervention size, not a percentage or probability.